From: jance <powerjance@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: binary render order?
   Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:54:46 -0800
Msg# 1092
View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
In article <1091-rush decimal general at seriss decimal com>,
 Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> wrote:

> 	by www.3dsite.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id jA41NkFH019694
> 
> 	for <rush decimal general at seriss decimal com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:23:46 -0800
> Received: (qmail 48305 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2005 01:24:41 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (unknown)
> 
>   by unknown with SMTP; 4 Nov 2005 01:24:41 -0000
> X-pair-Authenticated: 24.205.66.40
> Organization: Seriss Inc.
> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: rush decimal general at seriss decimal com
> In-Reply-To: <1090-rush decimal general at seriss decimal com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Path: 3dsite.com
> Xref: 3dsite.com rush.general:1091
> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
> 
> jance wrote:
> > [posted to rush.general]
> > 
> > At a facility I worked at that used Rush, there was an option in the 
> > submit scripts for the render order, where you could render in order 
> > (1,2,3,4,5...) or a "binary" order (first, last, middle...).  This was 
> > really handy because you could kick off your render and wait for three 
> > frames and you could spot check your shot.  I don't see that in the 
> > default submit scripts; was that something the facility put in 
> > themselves or am I missing something?
> 
> 	Sounds like a customization.
> 
> 	Either they submitted the job and changed the frame order afterwards
> 	with 'rush -reorder', or they tweaked the submit logic to break out
> 	the frame range into individual frames in the order they wanted.
> 
> 	FWIW, if you just want the first few frames rendered to be 
> first/middle/last,
> 	you can specify them in the 'Frames:' window manually, ie. instead of:
> 
> 		Frames: 1-100
> 
> 	..you can say instead:
> 
> 		Frames: 1 50 100 2-49 51-99
> 
> 	..which will get you a frame list where 1, 50 and 100 render first,
> 	followed by the rest in regular order:
> 
> STAT FRAME   TRY HOSTNAME        PID     JOBID            START          
> ELAPSED  NOTES
> Done 0001    1   ontario         29811   ontario.57       11/03,17:21:32 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0050    1   ontario         29814   ontario.57       11/03,17:21:44 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0100    1   ontario         29817   ontario.57       11/03,17:21:56 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0002    1   ontario         29821   ontario.57       11/03,17:22:08 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0003    1   ontario         29824   ontario.57       11/03,17:22:20 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0004    1   ontario         29827   ontario.57       11/03,17:22:32 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0005    1   ontario         29830   ontario.57       11/03,17:22:44 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0006    1   ontario         29833   ontario.57       11/03,17:22:56 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0007    1   ontario         29836   ontario.57       11/03,17:23:08 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0008    1   ontario         29839   ontario.57       11/03,17:23:20 
> 00:00:11
> Done 0009    1   ontario         29842   ontario.57       11/03,17:23:32 
> 00:00:11
> [..]

Cool.  I might have eventually thought of that!  I'll also see if I 
might be able to get my hands on the script I used before, if it's not 
too proprietary.

Thanks.

- Jance

Last Next