From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Problems with submit scripts after 102.42a6 update
   Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:48:24 -0400

Abraham Schneider wrote:

[posted to rush.general]

ok, checked some more stuff with our admin:

your redhat9-package won't run on our redhat9! If I do a 'ldd rushd' on this version I get:

        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
        libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/libm.so.6 (0x40028000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4004a000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40052000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

we don't have libstdc++.so.6 on our machines but libstdc++.so.5. Is this a different problem or do they belong together?

	I went through this recently with a customer over the weekend;
	there have been subtle changes in the kernel/library releases
	that caused me to have to make separate redhat9 vs. fedora3 releases.

	Can you double check the fedora3 vs redhat9 tar file
	from the download page:
	http://seriss.com/rush/releases/Readme-102.42a6.html

	(Your admin should have the user/password for that page.
	Do not share/request password info here on the group.)

	The redhat9 on that page was built on redhat9, the fedora3
	was built on fedora3.

--
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)(new)

** NOTE:
**	I will be on vacation July 11th through July 20th.
**	During that time, orders and email response may take over 24 hours.
**