From: Abraham Schneider <aschneider@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Problems with submit scripts after 102.42a6 update
   Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:14:21 -0400
Msg# 1329
View Complete Thread (17 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
Hi again!

My previous test already was with the redhat9 version. But I tested it again and also with the fedora3 version. I get the same "libstdc++.so.6 => not found" error with both versions!

Abraham

Greg Ercolano schrieb:
[posted to rush.general]

Abraham Schneider wrote:

[posted to rush.general]

ok, checked some more stuff with our admin:

your redhat9-package won't run on our redhat9! If I do a 'ldd rushd' on this version I get:

        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
        libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/libm.so.6 (0x40028000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4004a000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40052000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

we don't have libstdc++.so.6 on our machines but libstdc++.so.5. Is this a different problem or do they belong together?


    I went through this recently with a customer over the weekend;
    there have been subtle changes in the kernel/library releases
    that caused me to have to make separate redhat9 vs. fedora3 releases.

    Can you double check the fedora3 vs redhat9 tar file
    from the download page:
    http://seriss.com/rush/releases/Readme-102.42a6.html

    (Your admin should have the user/password for that page.
    Do not share/request password info here on the group.)

    The redhat9 on that page was built on redhat9, the fedora3
    was built on fedora3.



--
Abraham Schneider
VFX Compositor

ARRI Film & TV Services GmbH
Tuerkenstr. 89
D-80799 Muenchen

Phone: +49 89 3809-1269
Mobile: +49 173 5719842
Email: aschneider@(email surpressed)

Last Next