From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Limitation in frames command?
   Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:05:31 -0400
Msg# 1629
View Complete Thread (7 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
Dylan Penhale wrote:
> Thanks Greg
> 
> [2048] is good, but we will opt for splitting over multiple lines as suggested.
> Basically we just want to render out the 1st, middle and last frames, then
> the middle of those, then sort of fill in the gaps. We can create a small
> code to formulate that string when we submit.

	Right, every so often the 'binary tree' ordering comes up.

	Your approach is correct; to create 'frames' commands
	with the frames in the order you want them.

	I should probably make a '-btree' option flag for the 'frames'
	submit command, so that it will automatically generate a
	'binary tree' frame ordering for frame ranges. That way you
	could just do:

frames -btree 1-100

	..and it would generate the "1 50 100 25 75 .." frame ordering.
	I'll add it to ol' todo list for the upcoming major release.


-- 
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)

Last Next