Mr. Daniel Browne wrote:
> [posted to rush.general]
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> The 102.42a9c update seems to have fixed most of our operation =
> problems with Rush on SL (we love the new GUI look too, by the way), but =
> there is one thing we've noticed; rush on SL machines seems to stop =
> responding after pushing a hosts file. The failure happens even if the =
> file hasn't been changed. This requires you to restart the rush daemon, =
> much like how before this release we had to do whenever rush on an SL =
> machine stopped responding.
Hmm, can you send me the contents of the rushd.log from that machine
where the daemon stopped responding?
--
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Seriss Corporation
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)
|