From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Virtualization
   Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:31:42 -0400
Msg# 2227
View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
On 04/20/12 17:17, Mr. Daniel Browne wrote:
> If I wanted to run Rush on both a virtual machine and its native host, =
> would they both be able to share a license or would they have to be =
> licensed separately?

	The typical config of setting them up as separate hosts
	(ie. each with their own hostname) and both running at the
	same time would mean they'd consume separate licenses.

	Whether virtual or not, they're separate hosts conceptually
	(separate hostnames, separate network stacks, separate queues).

	The only way rush can share a license for a machine is if
	it's a dual boot box, both OS's having the same hostname,
	but not both running at the same time.

	If you wanted a 4 proc 8gig box to have 2 cpus/4gig for hosta
	and 2cpus/4gig for hostb, you'd configure them as if they were
	separate machines in rush.

-- 
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Seriss Corporation
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)ext.23
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)


Last Next